Early Radar Memories

Spitfire Site

“Working under the closest secrecy since 1939, over 4,000 WAAF personnel have played an important part in the air victories achieved by radiolocation (Radar). ...
1 2  |  Next »

Seventy-four years ago on February 26, 1935, experimental work conducted in Britain demonstrated that aircraft could be detected by radio. The history of this discovery and its vital role in Britain’s defence in 1940 and the following years has been told many times. But what of the observers, working calmly with evolving equipment, and always in danger of enemy attack? My sister, Jean Semple (nicknamed Sally), was one of the first service-women in Radio Detection and Ranging, as Radar Technology was originally known.

After joining the WAAF on March 20th, 1940, Jean embarked on the long training on the RF5 at Bawdsey Research Station at Bawdsey Manor. Bawdsey Manor was home to the very first Chain Home station .This is where the first RAF air exercises using radar were conducted in 1936-1937. By the outbreak of the war, the station was developed to the RDF training school. Poppa Jennings gave Jean’s group members their very first lectures on Course 6, courses 1 to 5 having been given before the war.

Two photos of Jean Semple in WAAF uniform
[via Katherine Reynolds]

With training complete, Jean received the ID: – 890144 – and was stationed firstly at Pevensey, secondly at Rye and her postings after that included a return to Bawdsey as an observer. She also served on the Isle of Man and at Douglas Wood. Her initial job-description was WAAF Special Duties. At the outset of hostilities the UK shortened the term ‘Radio Detection and Ranging’ to ‘Radio Location.’ When America came into the war they required the acronym ‘Radar’ to be used instead. At this point Jean and her colleagues became known as Radar Operators.

The type of Radar Jean worked on was called CH which stood for Chain Home. Chain Home was literally a chain of radio detection stations spaced twenty miles apart around the coast. At the outbreak of war in September, CH had eighteen stations covering the eastern and half of the southern coast of Britain, more stations being added later. Information from the stations was passed to RAF Fighter Command Headquarters located in Stanmore in North London.

The initial Chain Home used High Frequency (HF) wavelength meaning that it required large antenna masts to radiate sufficient power. Its four, 360-foot-high transmitter aerials were made of steel, while the four, 240-foot-high receiver aerials were of wood. The transmitter aerials sent pulses of radio energy, at varying heights, which, when reflected from an aircraft, were picked up by the receiver aerial.

Three of the four transmitter aerials of the Chain Home RDF are visible to the left, while the four receiver masts are grouped to the right

In the receiver room, the distance of the ‘echo’ could be measured on the face of the cathode ray tube. Establishing the position of the aircraft was a more complex matter. The device used for this purpose was a Goniometer, known as a Gonio, with coaxial cables leading to four coils that could be sensitised. With the help of this device, the position of the target could be ascertained through triangulation from other stations.

When a signal was transmitted, if there was an aircraft in the area, the body of that aircraft would bounce that signal back. If the signal stayed on the same bearing that would be great but if it kept changing all the time the observer had to react to the plane’s every move. In the view of Jean and her colleagues, the Spitfire returned the clearest signal of all aircraft being tracked at the time.

Jean touches on the complexities of her work:

‘Visualise the cathode ray tube. Running across its screen was a thin, horizontal green line. This was your time base. Fixed to the outside of the screen was a strip of Perspex, looking rather-like a ruler. This ‘ruler’ measured distances from 0 to 200 miles.

On the screen there’d be a whole lot of blips, looking a real mess. The left side of the thin, green line showed blips like planes beating but which were usually permanent echoes including those of church steeples and of our actual radar station. The first five miles of signals received were, therefore, usually ignored.’

Using the DF (Direction Finder) Jean would go to-and-fro through the time base, swinging the Goniometer to determine mileage and find bearings. The further away the blips, the wider she needed to swing. She’d be aiming to reduce the blips in length, until she could hold them right on the line.

One of the problems of the early Chain Home operations was the system’s inability to direct the transmitter signals, which made it impossible to establish if the tracked aircraft was flying at the calculated distance in front the radar chain, meaning over the sea, or behind it – inland. Early in the war, this caused a lot of confusion and unfortunate incidents. Jean describes the solution to this problem.

‘You needed to know whether, having sent a signal out, the returning blip was coming from inland or from out to sea. Only blips from out to sea needed to be passed to Stanmore. This is where the sensor button came in. You pushed the sensor button and watched. If the blip was coming from inland the signal on the screen would grow smaller. If it was coming from out to sea it would intensify.’

There was also a lot of working out on paper and there was what eventually proved to be a hit or miss formula for determining the height of a plane that you were plotting.

‘You established its range, multiplied that by 100, and then added two-thirds of the actual range squared. This calculation was meant to take into account the curvature of the earth.’

Radar operations were conducted under the veil of strict secrecy. In the case of invasion, operators were given revolvers. Should the station be endangered by the enemy, they were to fire the revolver at the screens, rendering them useless. In the beginning, each radar station also had an acid bath – a lead, acid filled tank kept close to operations. In the event of invasion all maps and other sensitive material was to be thrown into it.

On one occasion, Jean decided to try the system out. She threw some obsolete documents into the tank. The papers went in white with black lines on and came out dark-greyish with clear white lines on. The system was found wanting by testers, and subsequently removed from all stations.

1 2  |  Next »

13 Comments | Add New

By Dan Henderson  |  2010-05-29 at 02:46  |  permalink

Thank you so much, you Brits, for keeping the history of Chain Home active–we in the US owe you so much, and while we both gave much in the 39-45 time period, the history of Chain Home should never be forgotten–I spent 43 years working jamming of radar systems, but there was never a more effective radar system in all of History than Chain Home.

By Kathy  |  2017-02-27 at 06:46  |  permalink

That’s cleared my thoughts. Thanks for coitgnbutinr.

By Mike Wheatley  |  2011-09-07 at 22:06  |  permalink

Dear Katherine & Jean, Thanks for the article.

My father (Bob Wheatley) served as a radar technician on the CH radar from earlyy 1940 at Great Bromley.
He told me many stories of his experiences.
He was initially a civilian (from Radio Rentals) but was “persuaded” to enlist in the RAF by May 1940 (infantry or worse the navy was the alternative!).

He told me that the normal watch had 3 personnel (in receiver block) – is that right?

The only civilians he told me about (other than visiting boffins) were the Post Office engineers maintaining the “computation” gear. He said his were a solitary wierd bunch. Could your “Headache” be a really wierd one of these engineers? Or maybe a Boffin trying to improve the operation and procedures?

Please do get in touch with me as I have many memories from my dad to share!

Regards, Mike Wheatley

By julian foynes  |  2012-02-26 at 15:33  |  permalink


In 2010 I published a 90-page booklet on the radar station at Great Bromley, spelling out a lot of the events, techical side + some personal details. I have been interested in the subject for many years and have a lot on Gt Bromley down to site plans, photos and performance diagrams.
I also have the names of about 35 people who served on the station at various dates from 1938 to 1945.
I’d be very interested to hear from you about your Dad’s recollctions.

Julian Foynes (check me out as J P Foynes on British Library Catalogue or Amazon–though they haven’t listed this particular radar book yet).

By John Moore  |  2012-06-27 at 15:07  |  permalink

Good morning Julian,

I grew up in Great Yarmouth during the war. In 1957 I went ot Canada and in 1959 joined the RCAF as a Rdr Tech reciving my training at the famous RCAF Stn Clinton Ont. Unfortunately now closed. I served 37 years in the RCAF retiring in 1996. I have remained with them since now having worked in radar for 53 yrs.
I have been very involved in triyng to retain as much of our radar history as possible in our various museums. On the west coast of Canada on Vancouver Island there is the remains of what I believe is a CHL radar antenna whixh we would like to get restored however generating interest ($$$$) is proving difficult.
I noticed that you had pulbished a 90 page booklet on the radar at Great Bromley and I was wondering if I could purchase one for my collection of radar memorabilia.
I look forward to hearing from youi.

Regards, John Moore

By julian foynes  |  2012-09-23 at 11:23  |  permalink


Sorry to have overlooked your mail.
I’m phonable on 0208 570 0534.
Do give me a ring.

Julian Foynes

By Katherine Reynolds  |  2012-02-29 at 14:31  |  permalink

Dear Mike, my sister Jean Semple will be 90 on March 11th. I’m sorry I didn’t reply to your e-mail earlier but I didn’t know there was acomments section on tjhe Spitfire site.

Anything you might wish to say to my sister could be relayed to her in time for her birthday. Her memory is now quite bad but she has highly detailed recollection of the technical aspects of her job.

Do please send any comments to me and I’ll pass the on and check back with you.

Thanks. Katherine Reynolds.

By Hugh Frostick  |  2013-10-21 at 09:51  |  permalink

Dear Mike,
I have just come across your post and would be very interested to hear your father’s memories of his time in Gt Bromley. I am compiling a (social) history of Gt & Lt Bromley and am very interested in the wartime period.
Look forward to hearing, thanks

By Juliet Simpson  |  2012-04-24 at 15:29  |  permalink

Dear Katherine, could you please send me a copy of your article about Jean.
Many thanks, Juliet 3 Purcell

By Juliet Simpson  |  2012-04-24 at 15:30  |  permalink

Katherine, please send me a co9py of your story on Jean.
Thanks, Juliet (3 Purcell)

By Nancy Patrick Biscan  |  2013-02-09 at 03:19  |  permalink

My father’s name was Edwin (Jerry) Wallace Patrick and was involved in radar during WWII. He passed away in 2003 at the age of 86. Unfortunately he shared very little about his experiences and am wondering if anyone might have any articles available for me to read. He was stationed in Florida for a bit before going overseas.

Many thanks.

New Comment